Reference

Coal plants, pollution limits and CBAM

In a 23 June 2026 report, Bankwatch says Western Balkan coal plants continued to breach Energy Community pollution limits in 2025: NERP plants in four economies emitted 6.6 times more SO2 than allowed. For Serbia this is at once an air-quality issue, a legality question for old units, and an export-cost issue after the full CBAM regime started on 1 January 2026.

Updated: July 1, 2026 at 02:00 PMReviewed: July 1, 2026 at 02:00 PMClimate and EnvironmentEnergyEconomy

Also searched as

coal plant pollution limitsSerbian coal-fired power plantsCBAM and electricityEnergy Community NERPBankwatch Comply or Close

What it is

This is about old coal-fired power plants in the Western Balkans that were supposed to reduce emissions under Energy Community rules. Bankwatch's Comply or Close report of 23 June 2026 looks at 2025: the eighth year after new limits entered force for large combustion plants.

Which limits are checked

The main indicators are sulphur dioxide SO2, dust, and nitrogen oxides NOx. Some old units are covered by national emission reduction plans, or NERPs: the state has an overall emissions ceiling for a group of plants and must either bring them into compliance or close units that no longer have the right to keep operating in the old regime.

What the 2025 report shows

According to Bankwatch, coal plants in the NERPs of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Kosovo, North Macedonia, and Serbia emitted SO2 at 6.6 times the allowed level in 2025. Regional dust pollution was 2.9 times above the limit, and NOx was 1.4 times above the limit. Bosnia and Herzegovina was the largest SO2 source with 196,940 tonnes and a 12.7-fold exceedance; Serbia was second with 177,756 tonnes and a 5.1-fold exceedance.

Serbia's position

For Serbia, the report identifies TENT B as the largest NOx source among Serbian coal plants: 11,247 tonnes in 2025. Bankwatch also says Morava and Kolubara A are operating more than two years after their closure deadline. This is not a single accident: it is regular power-system operation in which old units remain in production even though their environmental and legal status is contested.

Promises and current status

Under Energy Community rules, large coal plants are supposed either to comply with limits or be taken out of operation. Bankwatch describes a different factual status: breaches continue, Western Balkan governments are not fining operators, and there are no clear updated modernisation or closure plans. Modernisation claims therefore matter only when paired with verifiable results on emissions and closure deadlines.

Where CBAM fits

CBAM is the EU's carbon border adjustment mechanism. Its full regime started on 1 January 2026; according to the EU and the Energy Community, it covers electricity among other goods, and EU importers must track embedded emissions and cover them through CBAM certificates. For Serbian electricity this is not a domestic fine for SO2 or dust, but a separate export risk: the more carbon-intensive the generation, the greater the possible extra cost when selling into the EU.

Why it matters

For residents this is about air quality and health, especially near energy and industrial zones. For the economy it is about the reliability of old capacity, future energy investment, and export competitiveness. For the state it is about meeting international commitments: if units are formally supposed to comply or close, but keep operating without penalties, the public does not see a clear timetable for who reduces pollution and when.

What needs to appear next

Since 1 January 2026, CBAM has already created administrative and financial obligations for electricity imports into the EU. For Serbia, the important next signals are clear updated plans for modernising or closing old coal units, including Morava and Kolubara A, and a clear regulatory response to limit breaches.

Sources

Note sources

Card

Fresh cards linked to this reference

Cards: 1

Updated: June 24, 2026 at 08:07 AM

Serbia ranks second in the region for coal-plant pollution, Bankwatch says

According to Bankwatch data carried by 021, coal-fired power plants in Serbia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Kosovo, and North Macedonia emitted 6.6 times more pollution than permitted in 2025. Serbia ranked second for SO2: 177,756 tonnes, or 5.1 times the allowed amount. The report also says regional dust pollution was 2.9 times above the limit and identifies TENT B as Serbia's largest NOx source at 11,247 tonnes; since January 2026, the CBAM mechanism has increased the cost of electricity exports to the EU.

Stories

Related long-running stories

Stories: 0

There are no related long-running stories yet.