Published: June 11, 2026 at 08:20 AM
Updated: June 11, 2026 at 08:05 PM
Card
Autokomanda and Senjak: the Interventna jedinica case has reached arrests and prosecutorial scrutiny
On June 11, N1 reported that deputy commander Mitar J., assistant commander Jugoslav S., and intervention team leader Nenad S. denied the allegations, while Steak and Wine Bar director Darko Z. remained silent during questioning before the Higher Prosecutor's Office. Prosecutors sought custody for Jugoslav S., Nenad S., and Darko Z., house arrest with electronic monitoring for Mitar J., and retired police colonel Slavica Radovanovic called the MUP's work in the Senjak case sloppy and amateurish.
This card belongs to the issue for June 11, 2026.
Open issueThis card belongs to the long-running story Boske, Senjak, and Autokomanda
.
No reference note has been assigned to this card yet.
Sources
Breakdown by publication
N1
Custody for the Interventna jedinica 92 commander and the intervention team leader over the obstruction of Vukovic's prosecution
(Pritvor komandantu Interventne jedinice 92 i vođi interventnog tima u vezi sa sprečavanjem procesuiranja Vukovića)
N1 says the case has reached the custody stage for the commander of Interventna jedinica 92 and the intervention team leader. The piece directly ties the procedural measures to suspicion that the normal prosecution of Sasa Vukovic Boske was obstructed after the Autokomanda shooting.
Read sourceN1
Prosecutor Lazic: it would be logical for the Supreme Public Prosecutor's Office to review the work of the Higher Prosecutor's Office in the Senjak case
(Tužilac Lazić: Bilo bi logično da Vrhovno javno tužilaštvo izvrši nadzor rada VJT u slučaju "Senjak")
In a second N1 item, prosecutor Nenad Lazic lifts the story to the level of oversight of the prosecution itself. That shifts the case from a standalone criminal episode to a question of trust in institutions and whether an outside review of the Higher Prosecutor's Office is needed.
Read sourceN1
Three Interventna jedinica 92 officers and the restaurant director were questioned; custody was requested
(Saslušana trojica pripadnika Interventne jedinice 92 i direktor restorana, zatražen pritvor)
N1 cites the Higher Prosecutor's Office: deputy commander Mitar J., assistant commander Jugoslav S., and intervention team leader Nenad S. denied the allegations, while Steak and Wine Bar director Darko Z. remained silent. After questioning, prosecutors requested custody for Jugoslav S., Nenad S., and Darko Z., and a ban on leaving home with electronic monitoring for Mitar J.
Read sourceN1
Radovanovic: MUP's operational work in the Senjak murder investigation was sloppy and amateurish
(Radovanović: Operativni rad MUP-a u istrazi ubistva na Senjaku urađen traljavo i amaterski)
Slavica Radovanovic, a retired police colonel, told N1 that the investigation into the killing at venue 27 in Senjak requires accountability from the leadership of the Criminal Police Directorate. She said cell-site data, material evidence, camera footage, movement routes, and information on who was in the venue should have been gathered in the first hours, but that three weeks later those answers remain unclear.
Read sourceKurir
Detained Interventna officers were questioned, denied covering up the shooting, and were remanded for up to 30 days
(SASLUŠANI UHAPŠENI PRIPADNICI INTERVENTNE: Negirali da su zataškavali pucnjavu; Određen im pritvor do 30 dana)
Kurir writes that the detained Interventna jedinica 92 officers denied the allegations of covering up the shooting and were remanded for up to 30 days. The emphasis is on questioning and the formal procedural stage rather than on institutional oversight.
Read source