Card

NIS and MOL: Serbia's deal with MOL does not remove the OFAC deadline of June 16

On June 11, minister Dubravka Djedovic Handanovic said Serbia had completed its part of the arrangement with MOL over NIS, but that an agreement between Gazprom Neft and MOL and US approval were still needed. By evening, N1 and Danas added expert framing: the extra five percent of shares does not itself create control without changing NIS's statute, while the current OFAC license expires on June 16.

Multiple sourcesPoliticsEconomyEnergy
Publication

Published: June 11, 2026 at 09:15 AM

Updated: June 11, 2026 at 08:05 PM

Related issue

This card belongs to the issue for June 11, 2026.

Open issue
Context

This card belongs to the long-running story NIS and sanctions.

Open story
Reference

No reference note has been assigned to this card yet.

MOL and NIS branding in coverage of the possible deal
Photo: Forbes/N1, article about the Serbia-MOL arrangement around NIS.

Sources

Breakdown by publication

Sources in this card: 5
N1
National mediaIndependent

Serbia and MOL reached a deal: will it become known what is written in the shareholder agreement

(Srbija i MOL postigli dogovor: Hoće li se znati šta piše u akcionarskom ugovoru)

Forbes/N1 writes that the day began with NIS requesting a new OFAC operating license because the current one expires on June 16, and ended with the minister's statement about a Serbia-MOL deal. If Gazprom Neft sells 56.15 percent of NIS to MOL and OFAC approves the transaction, Serbia is supposed to buy another five percent and gain broader management rights.

Read source
N1
National mediaIndependent

Djedovic Handanovic: next comes the Gazprom Neft-MOL agreement, then approval by the US administration

(Đedović Handanović: Sledi dogovor Gaspromnjefta i MOL-a, pa odobrenje američke administracije)

In a second N1 item, the minister explicitly clarifies that Serbia has, in her account, done its part, but that closing the deal still depends on the Russian and Hungarian sides and on US approval. That matters because a public compromise still does not mean the risk to supplies and refinery operations is gone before June 16.

Read source
Danas
National mediaIndependent

Djedovic Handanovic on the deal with MOL: we have finished our part, now everything is in the hands of the Russian and Hungarian side

(Đedović Handanović o dogovoru sa MOL-om: Mi smo naš posao završili, sada je sve u rukama ruske i mađarske strane)

Danas records the same crossroads but keeps practical conditions for NIS at the center: another five percent for Serbia, the role of the board, and guarantees for keeping the Pancevo refinery running. As a result, the minister's statement reads not as an end point but as an intermediate step in a complicated energy transaction.

Read source
N1
National mediaIndependent

N1 guests: what the compromise in MOL-Serbia talks means

(Gosti N1: Šta znači "kompromis" u pregovorima MOL-a i Srbije?)

N1 reports that MOL said it had completed talks with Serbia's government on a shareholder agreement for acquiring a majority stake in NIS, while talks with the seller and institutions continue. Economic journalist Mijat Lakicevic asks what Serbia gave in return for the refinery guarantee, and analyst Dragomir Andjelkovic says the NIS sale has become a political story for Russia, not only an economic one.

Read source
Danas
National mediaIndependent

Serbia-MOL deal: the state touts an extra five percent of shares, but they mean nothing without changing NIS's statute

(Dogovor Srbije i MOL-a: Država se hvali sa dodatnih pet odsto akcija, ali one ne znače ništa bez promene statuta NIS-a)

Danas quotes Nenad Gujanicic of Momentum Securities saying the extra five percent of shares looks like an empty and populist issue because 35 percent gives the state no more control than 30 percent unless NIS's statute changes. The article also restates the minister's conditions: MOL should keep the Pancevo refinery operating at least at the average annual level of the four years before sanctions, but the transaction still depends on Gazprom Neft, MOL, and OFAC.

Read source