Stories

Boske, Senjak, and Autokomanda

This story connects the shooting at a restaurant on Autokomanda, the arrests of Interventna jedinica 92 officers, the figure of Sasa Vukovic Boske, former Belgrade police chief Veselin Milic, and the separate Senjak branch. It is no longer only a crime chronicle but also a story about how police and prosecutors handle cases involving connected people.

Updated: June 20, 2026 at 02:05 PMFresh cards: 7IncidentsCourts and ProsecutionBelgrade

Stories

Boske, Senjak, and Autokomanda

Updated: June 20, 2026 at 02:05 PM

This story connects the shooting at a restaurant on Autokomanda, the arrests of Interventna jedinica 92 officers, the figure of Sasa Vukovic Boske, former Belgrade police chief Veselin Milic, and the separate Senjak branch. It is no longer only a crime chronicle but also a story about how police and prosecutors handle cases involving connected people.

  • The Autokomanda branch is about suspicion that some police officers failed to record the shooting properly and helped conceal procedural traces.
  • The name of Sasa Vukovic Boske appears as the figure whom, according to the prosecution's version, the authorities did not properly prosecute after the shooting.
  • On June 11, N1 reported that the commander of Interventna jedinica 92 and a team leader were placed in custody over obstruction of Vukovic's prosecution.
  • On the evening of June 11, N1 reported that Mitar J., Jugoslav S., and Nenad S. denied the allegations, Darko Z. remained silent, and the Higher Prosecutor's Office sought custody for Jugoslav S., Nenad S., and Darko Z. and house arrest with electronic monitoring for Mitar J.
  • In comments to N1, former inspector Sinisa Carevic says the restaurant owner's testimony, cameras, cell-site data, and phone contacts will matter.
  • Retired police colonel Slavica Radovanovic called MUP's work in the Senjak murder investigation sloppy and amateurish and tied the problem to the leadership of the Criminal Police Directorate.
  • The Senjak branch remains a separate but closely related story about a shooting, the killing of Aleksandar Nesovic, and complaints of police violence during questioning.
  • Prosecutor Nenad Lazic told N1 that it would be logical to review the work of the Higher Prosecutor's Office in the Senjak case at the level of the Supreme Public Prosecutor's Office.
  • On June 12, Novosti reported that the Higher Court in Belgrade extended custody for Veselin Milic for up to 30 days, and also extended custody for Sasa Vukovic, Mario S., Danka V., Nenad L., Dejan S., and Jasna Z. in the Aleksandar Nesovic Baja murder case.
  • On June 13, 021 carried the Higher Prosecutor's Office explanation: the part of the complaint against Milic alleging assistance to the perpetrator after the crime was dismissed because further evidence and testimony did not confirm that he called Nesovic to come without security, was in the restaurant at the time of the killing, or removed traces.
  • On June 13, prosecutors expanded the investigation into Aleksandar Nesovic's killing: Sasa V. and Mario S. are suspected of aggravated murder as co-perpetrators, Danka V. of assisting aggravated murder, and evidentiary actions were ordered against Veselin M. and seven others in the failure-to-report and assistance-after-the-crime branches.
  • On June 16, Sasa Vukovic Boske was questioned at the Higher Prosecutor's Office at his own request; lawyer Ivan Simic confirmed that questioning continues on June 17, while details of the statement are not known.
  • On June 18, Novosti reported that Vukovic Boske spent two days giving his defense in the presence of three Higher Prosecutor's Office prosecutors over suspicion in the killing of Aleksandar Nesovic Baja at restaurant "27" in Senjak.
  • On June 20, VJT ordered the Second Basic Prosecutor's Office to form a case and identify unknown persons who, according to the defense, threatened Veselin Milic in Belgrade district jail; the prison administration said it follows safety procedures for all detainees.

Fresh cards on this topic

Timeline

How the story developed

According to N1, Danas, Kurir, and Novosti, a shooting incident took place at the Steak and Wine Bar on Autokomanda. The prosecution later said it suspected that some police officers had failed to carry out the necessary steps after the event.

The Senjak branch intensified through reporting on the killing of Aleksandar Nesovic and complaints of police violence during questioning. N1 stressed that prosecutors were not releasing details, citing the protection of the pre-investigation phase.

All four outlets wrote about the arrest of the commander and officers of Interventna jedinica 92. N1 and Danas stressed institutional failure and procedural violations, Kurir personalized the case through the figure of the commander, and Novosti relayed the official prosecutorial position.

N1 reported that the commander of Interventna jedinica 92 and a team leader were placed in custody, and later detailed the questioning of Mitar J., Jugoslav S., Nenad S., and Darko Z. After the questioning, the Higher Prosecutor's Office sought custody for Jugoslav S., Nenad S., and Darko Z., house arrest for Mitar J., while Slavica Radovanovic called MUP's work in the Senjak branch sloppy and amateurish.

Novosti reported that the preliminary-proceedings judge of the Higher Court in Belgrade extended custody for up to 30 days for Veselin Milic, Sasa Vukovic, Mario S., Danka V., Nenad L., Dejan S., and Jasna Z. in the Aleksandar Nesovic Baja murder case.

021 carried the Higher Prosecutor's Office explanation for dismissing part of the complaint against Veselin Milic: subsequent evidence and testimony did not confirm a call inviting Aleksandar Nesovic to come without security, Milic's presence in the restaurant at the time of the killing, or his removal of traces.

Prosecutors expanded the investigation into Aleksandar Nesovic's killing: Sasa V. and Mario S. are suspected of aggravated murder as co-perpetrators, Danka V. of assisting aggravated murder, and evidentiary actions were ordered against Veselin M., Nenad L., Vuk S., Petar U., Dejan S., Jasna Z., Milos J., and Dusan V.

Sasa Vukovic Boske, whom prosecutors describe as the direct perpetrator in Aleksandar Nesovic's killing, was questioned at his own request; lawyer Ivan Simic said the questioning continues on June 17.

Novosti reported that Vukovic Boske spent two days giving his defense before three Higher Prosecutor's Office prosecutors over suspicions in Aleksandar Nesovic Baja's killing at restaurant "27" in Senjak.

After the defense alleged threats to Veselin Milic in Belgrade district jail, VJT ordered the Second Basic Prosecutor's Office to identify unknown persons, while the prison administration said it strictly follows safety procedures for all detainees.

Card

Fresh materials on this topic

Updated: June 20, 2026 at 02:05 PM

VJT orders a check of threats to Veselin Milic in Belgrade district jail

After a filing from Veselin Milic's defense lawyer, prosecutors ordered the Second Basic Prosecutor's Office to identify unknown persons who allegedly threatened him in Belgrade district jail. The prison administration told N1/Danas it strictly follows safety procedures for all detainees, while Danas recalls that on June 12 the court extended Milic's custody until July 12 in the failure-to-report-a-crime-and-perpetrator branch.

Updated: June 16, 2026 at 08:31 PM

Sasa Vukovic Boske questioned in the Senjak case; hearing continues tomorrow

On June 16, Sasa Vukovic Boske, whom prosecutors describe as the direct perpetrator in the killing of Aleksandar Nesovic Baja at restaurant "27" in Senjak, was questioned at the Higher Prosecutor's Office in Belgrade at his own request. His lawyer Ivan Simic confirmed to Insajder/N1 that questioning will continue on June 17, while the details of the statement remain unknown.

Updated: June 13, 2026 at 02:05 PM

Senjak: prosecutors expand the Nesovic murder investigation and clarify Milic's role

On June 13, the Higher Prosecutor's Office said it had expanded the investigation into Aleksandar Nesovic's killing at restaurant "27" in Senjak: Sasa V. and Mario S. are now suspected of aggravated murder as co-perpetrators, Danka V. of assisting aggravated murder, and evidentiary actions were ordered for eight more suspects. Veselin Milic now appears in the failure-to-report branch; prosecutors had earlier explained that the assistance-after-the-crime part of the complaint was dismissed because evidence did not confirm he was present at the killing or removed traces.

Updated: June 12, 2026 at 08:03 PM

Senjak: court extends custody for Veselin Milic and other suspects for up to 30 days

On June 12, Novosti reported that the Higher Court in Belgrade extended custody for former Belgrade police chief Veselin Milic for up to 30 days so he could not destroy, hide, alter, or falsify evidence. In a separate item, Novosti said custody was also extended for up to 30 days for Sasa Vukovic, Mario S., Danka V., Nenad L., Dejan S., and Jasna Z. in the Aleksandar Nesovic Baja murder case.

Updated: June 11, 2026 at 08:05 PM

Autokomanda and Senjak: the Interventna jedinica case has reached arrests and prosecutorial scrutiny

On June 11, N1 reported that deputy commander Mitar J., assistant commander Jugoslav S., and intervention team leader Nenad S. denied the allegations, while Steak and Wine Bar director Darko Z. remained silent during questioning before the Higher Prosecutor's Office. Prosecutors sought custody for Jugoslav S., Nenad S., and Darko Z., house arrest with electronic monitoring for Mitar J., and retired police colonel Slavica Radovanovic called the MUP's work in the Senjak case sloppy and amateurish.

Updated: June 10, 2026 at 08:00 PM

Autokomanda and Senjak: arrests in Interventna jedinica 92 pushed the case toward the question of a covered-up shooting

On June 10, outlets linked arrests in Interventna jedinica 92 to the shooting at a restaurant on Autokomanda and to a possible cover-up of procedural steps after the incident. The story quickly moved beyond crime reporting into a broader question about how police and prosecutors handle cases involving connected figures.

Sources

Key links for this story