Published: June 26, 2026 at 08:06 PM
Updated: June 26, 2026 at 09:08 PM
Card
Transparency Serbia: political-finance bill moved without ODIHR opinion
On June 26, Transparency Serbia said amendments to the Law on Financing Political Activities entered parliamentary procedure before ODIHR published an opinion and still fail to solve oversight, sanctions, and spending-limit problems. The Finance Committee scheduled four public hearings: June 30 in Kragujevac, July 1 in Nis, July 2 in Novi Sad, and July 3 in Belgrade.
Multiple sourcesPolitics
This card belongs to the issue for June 26, 2026.
Open issueNo separate context story has been assigned to this card yet.
No reference note has been assigned to this card yet.
Sources
Breakdown by publication
N1
Transparency Serbia: Amendments to the Law on Financing Political Activities are proceeding without ODIHR opinion
(Transparentnost Srbija: Izmene Zakona o finansiranju političkih aktivnosti bez mišljenja ODIHR)
N1 carries Transparency Serbia's assessment: the proposal submitted by SNS MP Miroslav Petrašinović is almost identical to the draft parliament sent to ODIHR on May 12, 2026, but ODIHR's opinion on it has not yet been published. The organization says the proposal fails to solve two key areas - oversight and sanctions - and that instead of a government bill with formal public consultation, the authorities are again using an MP-sponsored bill and public hearings. TS says the proposed spending cap is too high: 6 million euros for a list or candidate, 7 million euros for a two-round presidential election, and 12-13 million euros for combined elections; it proposes 300 million dinars, about 2.5 million euros. TS also criticizes the absence of sanctions for breaking caps, an overly broad third-party campaign rule, and abolition of the election deposit requirement because forced recovery of money from lists below 1% of votes would be impossible in most cases.
Read sourceDanas
What does TS object to in the changes to the Law on Financing Political Activities?
(Šta TS zamera promenama Zakona o finansiranju političkih aktivnosti?)
Danas carries the TS statement and notes that the previous version of the law, on which ODIHR issued an opinion on May 11, 2026, did not include solutions for oversight and sanctions, and that those shortcomings remain in the current proposal. The outlet cites TS's calculation: a 6 million euro cap for a list or candidate and a 12-13 million euro cap in combined elections is higher than all reported expenses of the SNS-led coalition in 2022, when parliamentary, presidential, and Belgrade elections were held - about 10 million euros. TS cites comparable countries - Czechia, Bulgaria, Croatia, and Slovakia - and proposes a 300 million dinar cap. The organization also warns that abolishing the election deposit requirement could encourage filing lists for budget money.
Read sourceKurir
Four public hearings on the Law on Financing Political Activities
(ČETIRI JAVNA SLUŠANJA O ZAKONU O FINANSIRANJU POLITIČKIH AKTIVNOSTI: Biće održana u Kragujevcu, Nišu, Novom Sadu i Beogradu)
Kurir reports the decision of parliament's Finance, Budget, and Public Spending Control Committee: four public hearings will be held on the bill submitted by Miroslav Petrašinović. The dates and cities are June 30 in Kragujevac, July 1 in Nis, July 2 in Novi Sad, and July 3 in Belgrade. Committee chair Veroljub Arsić said invitees will include committee members, MPs, the working group for improving the electoral process, the Finance Ministry, the Anti-Corruption Agency, RIK, the voter-list commission, the National Convention on the EU, CRTA, CESID, Transparency Serbia, the OSCE mission, the EU delegation, the U.S., U.K., German, Italian, French, and Norwegian embassies, and interested members of the public. Arsić rejected Dušan Nikezić's criticism that public debate is being replaced by hearings, while Petrašinović said the amendments, among other things, abolish election deposits for political actors without MPs.
Read source