Published: June 10, 2026 at 03:35 PM
Updated: June 10, 2026 at 08:00 PM
Card
On June 10, outlets linked arrests in Interventna jedinica 92 to the shooting at a restaurant on Autokomanda and to a possible cover-up of procedural steps after the incident. The story quickly moved beyond crime reporting into a broader question about how police and prosecutors handle cases involving connected figures.
Published: June 10, 2026 at 03:35 PM
Updated: June 10, 2026 at 08:00 PM
This card belongs to the issue for June 10, 2026.
Open issueThis card belongs to the long-running story Boske, Senjak, and Autokomanda
.
No reference note has been assigned to this card yet.

Sources
(Bivši inspektor: Milićeva sudbina zavisiće od iskaza vlasnika restorana)
Through comments from former inspector Sinisa Carevic, N1 showed that the case goes beyond a single arrest and could touch former Belgrade police chief Veselin Milic. Its focus is the remaining testimony, cameras, cell-site data, and phone contacts as the key to who really knew about the shooting and what may have been concealed.
Read source(VJT: Policija prikrila pucnjavu)
Danas framed the story through the prosecution's direct claim that the police covered up the shooting. That angle makes the core issue not the crime background itself but an institutional failure and the question of why formal procedure did not work immediately after the incident.
Read source(Hitno se oglasilo tužilaštvo: Ovo su detalji hapšenja pripadnika Interventne jedinice 92)
Novosti retold the prosecution's official line and focused on the procedural details of the arrests of Interventna jedinica 92 officers. In that framing, there is less attention to the network of relationships and more to what the investigation is formally saying about its own progress.
Read source