Public Assembly Archive estimates SNS rally at 32,500 people, pro-government outlets cite 207,000
N1 reports the Public Assembly Archive estimate: during Aleksandar Vucic's June 27 speech at 18:55, the "Srbija jedna porodica" rally had 32,500 people, counted manually on an orthophoto. Danas updated its article with reactions from Milenko Jovanov and Ana Brnabic, who mocked the estimate; Kurir continues to cite more than 207,000 participants.
Breakdown by publication
How sources frame this story
Mobile shows the first 3; the full breakdown is available on desktop.
Public Assembly Archive publishes estimate: how many people were present during Vucic's speech
N1 writes that the Public Assembly Archive posted on X its crowd estimate for the SNS rally during Aleksandar Vucic's speech. According to its calculation, at 18:55 there were 32,500 people in the area. The post cites manual annotation on an orthophoto, image dimensions of 15,711 x 13,555 px, GSD of 6.29 cm/px, an MUP overestimate factor of about 6.4, and fifth place by size among gatherings organized by the current authorities. N1 notes that MUP said on June 27 that about 207,000 citizens were in front of the National Assembly building.
Danas: new SNS reactions to the Public Assembly Archive crowd estimate
Danas writes that Milenko Jovanov, chair of the SNS parliamentary group in Serbia's Assembly, reacted to the Public Assembly Archive estimate that 32,500 people attended the "Srbija jedna porodica" rally. The updated article, published on June 28 at 17:26, also highlights Ana Brnabic's mocking comment that she counted 342 people and 6 robots.
Key rally messages: Vucic lays out plans before 207,000 people
Kurir publishes the pro-government framing of the rally and writes that Vucic spoke before 207,000 people. The article calls the gathering "historic," emphasizes the "Srbija jedna porodica" slogan, and relays Vucic's messages about future policy, development, and change. Unlike N1 and Danas, it does not discuss the Public Assembly Archive estimate, but it shows the initial attendance framing that was later disputed.